• NAAAP Phoenix is now ACEL

    NAAAP Phoenix is now ACEL

  • Grow Your Skills to Becoming a Better Communicator - 2nd & 4th Thursdays of each month at 6:30pm

    Grow Your Skills to Becoming a Better Communicator - 2nd & 4th Thursdays of each month at 6:30pm

  • Summer Networking Mixer at the Saguaro Scottsdale - Tues., August 5 at 5:30pm

    Summer Networking Mixer at the Saguaro Scottsdale - Tues., August 5 at 5:30pm

  • We Need Your Helping Hands at St. Mary's Food Bank on Saturday, September 20, 2014

    We Need Your Helping Hands at St. Mary's Food Bank on Saturday, September 20, 2014

Visit our blog to find out the latest news

about NAAAP Phoenix!

Membership has its privileges!

Click to find out what being a

NAAAP Member can give you!



NAAAP is an all-volunteer, 501(c)(3) non-profit
organization that brings together
Asian American professionals and provides
opportunities for their success through leadership
development, career advancement, and community impact.



Learn more and see what our committees

do to help further our mission.

 

 

Welcome to NAAAP Phoenix!

History

 

Affiliated with the National Association of Asian American Professionals (NAAAP), NAAAP-Phoenix is a non-profit organization servicing its members, their families, friends and the greater metropolitan Phoenix communities.

 

Read More...
 
PDC
PDC

The Professional Development Committee develops programs which address the needs and concerns of Asian Pacific Americans as they enter the workforce, advance in their careers and become leaders in their profession and in the Asian American community.

Read More...
 
CAC
CAC

The Cultural Awareness Committee supports activities that enhance a more wide spread perception of Asian Americans which in turn raises cultural awareness to the public.  NAAAP-Phoenix encourages its members to network and build relationships with other Asian groups within our community.

Read More...
 
CSC
CSC

The Community Service Committee provides a variety of volunteer opportunities and other events to help engage NAAAP-Phoenix members in community outreach efforts. Other events include Special Olympics, Mesa Food Bank, Holiday Toy Drive and Dinner.

Read More...
 
MEN
MEN

The Mentorship Committee seeks innovative ways to attract mentors, mentees and corporation to the Mentorship Program, hosts monthly meetings, oversees the mentorship application and interview process, manages the dissemination and collection or quarterly program reviews from participants . . .

Read More...
 

Whitehouse.gov

White House.gov Press Office Feed
  • Readout of the President’s Call to President Peña Nieto of Mexico

    This evening President Obama spoke by phone with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto in advance of his meeting tomorrow with the Presidents of Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador. They followed up on earlier discussions on a coordinated policy addressing the influx of unaccompanied children coming from Central America, through Mexico, to the U.S.-Mexico border. The President noted President Peña Nieto’s announcement of a comprehensive strategy to improve controls and safeguards along its border with Guatemala and Belize, and exchanged views on how we can deepen cooperation.

    The President noted that these unaccompanied children are vulnerable to crime and abuse, and welcomed Mexico’s efforts to help target the criminals that lure families to send children on the dangerous journey and to alert potential migrants to the perils of the journey and the likelihood that they will be returned to Central America. The President also reiterated that arriving migrants will not qualify for legalization under proposed immigration reform legislation or deferred action for childhood arrivals (DACA).

    The Presidents also exchanged ideas on how the United States and Mexico can work with regional partners and collaborate with Central American leaders to address the underlying causes leading to migration. They discussed the possibility of regional programs that would pool resources to improve public security and increase economic opportunities in Central America.

  • Gaggle by Deputy Press Secretary Eric Schultz, 07/24/14

    Private Residence
    Los Angeles, California 

    10:33 A.M. PDT

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Thank you all for joining us.  I'll just have a brief announcement at the top that the President later today will deliver remarks at the Los Angeles Trade Technical College, where he will again call for our nation to rally around economic patriotism that says rather than protecting wasteful tax loopholes for a few at the top we should be investing in things like education and job training that grow the economy for everybody. 

    Specifically, the President will highlight the need to close one of the country’s most unfair tax loopholes that allows companies to avoid paying taxes here at home and will call on Congress to close it immediately.

    With that, I will take your questions.

    Q    Eric, can you settle the question of what the President did last night at the hotel?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Sure.  As I mentioned yesterday, the President had a full day of events.  You were with him at each of them.  In fact, you filed 17 pool reports tracking each one of his movements.  (Laughter.)  Last night, the President didn’t have any public events or leave the hotel.  If he had you would have been with him.

    Q    Was he meeting with anyone for dinner?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Again, he didn’t leave the hotel.  And if he would, you would have been with him.  And he didn’t have any public events. 

    Q    The Speaker’s office put out a bit of prebuttal to the President’s speech today.  They say that these companies aren't taking advantage of a tax loophole to move overseas.  They say it's not a loophole, but they’re doing this because of the high tax rate.  What’s your response?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  To quote Josh Earnest, I don't think that claim withstands scrutiny.  Right now, a few big corporations are shifting their residence for tax purposes outside the country to get out of paying taxes even though they keep their headquarters and most of their business inside the United States.  These transactions are known as inversions.  And the President today will call on Congress to take action to close this specific loophole immediately.

    Q    Democrats are divided over whether to take action on inversions.  On Capitol Hill, we have reports saying that today. What is the White House going to do to convince members of their own party to take action?  How likely do you all think legislation is?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Sure, I'd say a few things.  One, we support congressional proposals that have been proposed recently that would make the effective date for action retroactive to early May 2014, given the significant upsurge in activity in this area to date.

    As you know, Senators Wyden and Levin and Congressman Levin and Van Hollen have supported legislation to address this abuse of our tax system and make it retroactive.  The President today will call on Republicans in Congress to do what they did 10 years ago when the Republican-led Congress cracked down on corporations moving to offshore tax havens like the Cayman Islands and do it again.  I'll note that that happened in 2004 and signed into law by a Republican President.

    Q    Will the President accept campaign contributions from companies or executives, companies that practice corporate inversions or complete those kinds of mergers?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Again, the President today is calling on Congress to close this tax loophole.

    Q    Does he believe that there’s any realistic chance of it happening, given the track record with Congress?  Or is this another thing that the President proposes and doesn't actually happen?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Isaac, you’re so cynical.  (Laughter.)  I understand the basis for the cynicism, but we do believe that this, again, is an issue that has garnered bipartisan support in the past and we don't understand why it wouldn’t again this time.

    Q    Eric, apropos having a basis for cynicism, the reason we were pressing you yesterday and today about the President’s plans last night is because the last time we did this, he had dinner with Jeffrey Katzenberg.  Is there a reason you can't just tell us what he did in his hotel, even though it wasn’t a pool movement that we were involved in?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Again, I understand the interest here.  Our obligation to you is to let you know when there is a public movement or even a private meeting you are often -- you often join us for.  There was no public events, and he stayed in the hotel after a long busy day last night.

    Q    -- economic patriotism, is he suggesting that the CEOs that do these transactions are unpatriotic?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  We believe that this is a loophole -- let me back up.  The middle class in this country, the President believes, is the engine for economic growth.  And we believe that we should be supporting businesses and working people who contribute to that cause here at home.  That's why when companies are using loopholes to take advantage and reduce the tax base, we believe that should be something addressed; that should be something addressed immediately; that has garnered bipartisan support in the past from Democrats and Republicans, signed into law under a Republican President.  We don't see any reason why that can't happen again.

    Q    Does he agree with Senator Reid’s characterization that these are corporate citizenship scams?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  I have not spoken with the President about Senator Reid’s statements on this.  But I do think the President has made clear these companies are essentially renouncing their American citizenship by shipping their profits overseas to avoid paying taxes, even as they benefit from all the advantage of being here in America.  That's precisely what we mean by economic patriotism.

    Q    Do you have any more on the meeting tomorrow with Central American leaders?  Is there anything you can tell us about what precisely the President is going to ask of them, and any development that might come out of that?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  I don’t have a readout of a future meeting yet, so as soon as we have more guidance on that, I will get that to you.

    Q    Eric, I just wanted to know about the White House’s developing guidelines on corporate drones -- on privacy rights on drones -- can you talk a little bit about that?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  I have seen that story, but, unfortunately, I don’t have any comment right now for you.  What we have said on this issue in the past is that the interagency continues to develop and review policies concerning the domestic use of unmanned aircraft systems, and that remains that case.

    Q    Just a quick sanctions question.  The EU is coming out with a sanctions list.  Is the U.S. going to add to that?  And what’s your take on the EU sanctions?  Are they sufficiently severe?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Thank you, Lisa.  We welcome reports that the EU is likely adding additional names to its sanctions list today, but I don’t have any details for you at this moment.  We also understand they’re continuing discussions to impose further, more significant measures.  I know those preparations continue for more robust measures.  We anticipate some of their names will overlap with those already sanctioned -- that we have already sanctioned, and we will look closely at that list when it comes out. 

    Q    Eric, can we go back to economic patriotism for a second?  Are companies that are not doing what the President wants here and people who are not supporting that legislation not economically patriotic?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  I appreciate the question, Isaac.  I would just again reiterate that when companies are renouncing their American citizenship by shipping their profits overseas to avoid paying taxes even as they benefit from all the advantages of being here in America that raises significant questions.  And that’s something that can be addressed very quickly by Congress, as they did in 2004, again signed into law by a Republican President. 

    Q    Can you tell us what the administration is doing to make sure that the supplemental gets passed?  It sounds like some Republicans are saying the White House is not actually actively pursuing or working to get that passed.  And it sounds like it’s not going to happen before the recess. 

    MR. SCHULTZ:  I’m not going to prognosticate, but I will tell you I take issue with the characterization that the White House isn’t working aggressively on this.  We sent a letter a few weeks ago outlining our request.  We’ve heard a lot of concerns expressed by Republicans in Congress.  We hope that those concerns are backed up by action, because we need to surge resources to the border in order to address the problem.

    Q    And if it doesn’t happen by the recess, will you guys transfer funds to cover the period until Congress returns to provide more resources?
    MR. SCHULTZ:  Again, our belief is that Congress must act. 

    END  
    10:42 A.M. PDT

  • Gaggle by Deputy Press Secretary Eric Schultz, 07/24/14

    Private Residence
    Los Angeles, California 

    10:33 A.M. PDT

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Thank you all for joining us.  I'll just have a brief announcement at the top that the President later today will deliver remarks at the Los Angeles Trade Technical College, where he will again call for our nation to rally around economic patriotism that says rather than protecting wasteful tax loopholes for a few at the top we should be investing in things like education and job training that grow the economy for everybody. 

    Specifically, the President will highlight the need to close one of the country’s most unfair tax loopholes that allows companies to avoid paying taxes here at home and will call on Congress to close it immediately.

    With that, I will take your questions.

    Q    Eric, can you settle the question of what the President did last night at the hotel?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Sure.  As I mentioned yesterday, the President had a full day of events.  You were with him at each of them.  In fact, you filed 17 pool reports tracking each one of his movements.  (Laughter.)  Last night, the President didn’t have any public events or leave the hotel.  If he had you would have been with him.

    Q    Was he meeting with anyone for dinner?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Again, he didn’t leave the hotel.  And if he would, you would have been with him.  And he didn’t have any public events. 

    Q    The Speaker’s office put out a bit of prebuttal to the President’s speech today.  They say that these companies aren't taking advantage of a tax loophole to move overseas.  They say it's not a loophole, but they’re doing this because of the high tax rate.  What’s your response?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  To quote Josh Earnest, I don't think that claim withstands scrutiny.  Right now, a few big corporations are shifting their residence for tax purposes outside the country to get out of paying taxes even though they keep their headquarters and most of their business inside the United States.  These transactions are known as inversions.  And the President today will call on Congress to take action to close this specific loophole immediately.

    Q    Democrats are divided over whether to take action on inversions.  On Capitol Hill, we have reports saying that today. What is the White House going to do to convince members of their own party to take action?  How likely do you all think legislation is?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Sure, I'd say a few things.  One, we support congressional proposals that have been proposed recently that would make the effective date for action retroactive to early May 2014, given the significant upsurge in activity in this area to date.

    As you know, Senators Wyden and Levin and Congressman Levin and Van Hollen have supported legislation to address this abuse of our tax system and make it retroactive.  The President today will call on Republicans in Congress to do what they did 10 years ago when the Republican-led Congress cracked down on corporations moving to offshore tax havens like the Cayman Islands and do it again.  I'll note that that happened in 2004 and signed into law by a Republican President.

    Q    Will the President accept campaign contributions from companies or executives, companies that practice corporate inversions or complete those kinds of mergers?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Again, the President today is calling on Congress to close this tax loophole.

    Q    Does he believe that there’s any realistic chance of it happening, given the track record with Congress?  Or is this another thing that the President proposes and doesn't actually happen?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Isaac, you’re so cynical.  (Laughter.)  I understand the basis for the cynicism, but we do believe that this, again, is an issue that has garnered bipartisan support in the past and we don't understand why it wouldn’t again this time.

    Q    Eric, apropos having a basis for cynicism, the reason we were pressing you yesterday and today about the President’s plans last night is because the last time we did this, he had dinner with Jeffrey Katzenberg.  Is there a reason you can't just tell us what he did in his hotel, even though it wasn’t a pool movement that we were involved in?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Again, I understand the interest here.  Our obligation to you is to let you know when there is a public movement or even a private meeting you are often -- you often join us for.  There was no public events, and he stayed in the hotel after a long busy day last night.

    Q    -- economic patriotism, is he suggesting that the CEOs that do these transactions are unpatriotic?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  We believe that this is a loophole -- let me back up.  The middle class in this country, the President believes, is the engine for economic growth.  And we believe that we should be supporting businesses and working people who contribute to that cause here at home.  That's why when companies are using loopholes to take advantage and reduce the tax base, we believe that should be something addressed; that should be something addressed immediately; that has garnered bipartisan support in the past from Democrats and Republicans, signed into law under a Republican President.  We don't see any reason why that can't happen again.

    Q    Does he agree with Senator Reid’s characterization that these are corporate citizenship scams?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  I have not spoken with the President about Senator Reid’s statements on this.  But I do think the President has made clear these companies are essentially renouncing their American citizenship by shipping their profits overseas to avoid paying taxes, even as they benefit from all the advantage of being here in America.  That's precisely what we mean by economic patriotism.

    Q    Do you have any more on the meeting tomorrow with Central American leaders?  Is there anything you can tell us about what precisely the President is going to ask of them, and any development that might come out of that?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  I don’t have a readout of a future meeting yet, so as soon as we have more guidance on that, I will get that to you.

    Q    Eric, I just wanted to know about the White House’s developing guidelines on corporate drones -- on privacy rights on drones -- can you talk a little bit about that?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  I have seen that story, but, unfortunately, I don’t have any comment right now for you.  What we have said on this issue in the past is that the interagency continues to develop and review policies concerning the domestic use of unmanned aircraft systems, and that remains that case.

    Q    Just a quick sanctions question.  The EU is coming out with a sanctions list.  Is the U.S. going to add to that?  And what’s your take on the EU sanctions?  Are they sufficiently severe?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  Thank you, Lisa.  We welcome reports that the EU is likely adding additional names to its sanctions list today, but I don’t have any details for you at this moment.  We also understand they’re continuing discussions to impose further, more significant measures.  I know those preparations continue for more robust measures.  We anticipate some of their names will overlap with those already sanctioned -- that we have already sanctioned, and we will look closely at that list when it comes out. 

    Q    Eric, can we go back to economic patriotism for a second?  Are companies that are not doing what the President wants here and people who are not supporting that legislation not economically patriotic?

    MR. SCHULTZ:  I appreciate the question, Isaac.  I would just again reiterate that when companies are renouncing their American citizenship by shipping their profits overseas to avoid paying taxes even as they benefit from all the advantages of being here in America that raises significant questions.  And that’s something that can be addressed very quickly by Congress, as they did in 2004, again signed into law by a Republican President. 

    Q    Can you tell us what the administration is doing to make sure that the supplemental gets passed?  It sounds like some Republicans are saying the White House is not actually actively pursuing or working to get that passed.  And it sounds like it’s not going to happen before the recess. 

    MR. SCHULTZ:  I’m not going to prognosticate, but I will tell you I take issue with the characterization that the White House isn’t working aggressively on this.  We sent a letter a few weeks ago outlining our request.  We’ve heard a lot of concerns expressed by Republicans in Congress.  We hope that those concerns are backed up by action, because we need to surge resources to the border in order to address the problem.

    Q    And if it doesn’t happen by the recess, will you guys transfer funds to cover the period until Congress returns to provide more resources?
    MR. SCHULTZ:  Again, our belief is that Congress must act. 

    END  
    10:42 A.M. PDT

  • Message to the Congress -- Amendment Between the United States and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

    TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES:

    I am pleased to transmit to the Congress, pursuant to section 123 d. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the text of an amendment (the "Amendment") to the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense Purposes of July 3, 1958, as amended (the "1958 Agreement").  I am also pleased to transmit my written approval, authorization, and determination concerning the Amendment.  The joint unclassified letter submitted to me by the Secretaries of Defense and Energy providing a summary position on the unclassified portions of the Amendment is also enclosed. The joint classified letter and classified portions of the Amendment are being transmitted separately via appropriate channels.

    The Amendment extends for 10 years (until December 31, 2024), provisions of the 1958 Agreement that permit the transfer between the United States and the United Kingdom of classified information concerning atomic weapons; nuclear technology and controlled nuclear information; material and equipment for the development of defense plans; training of personnel; evaluation of potential enemy capability; development of delivery systems; and the research, development, and design of military reactors.  Additional revisions to portions of the Amendment and Annexes have been made to ensure consistency with current United States and United Kingdom policies and practice regarding nuclear threat reduction, naval nuclear propulsion, and personnel security.

    In my judgment, the Amendment meets all statutory requirements.  The United Kingdom intends to continue to maintain viable nuclear forces into the foreseeable future. Based on our previous close cooperation, and the fact that the United Kingdom continues to commit its nuclear forces to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, I have concluded it is in the United States national interest to continue to assist the United Kingdom in maintaining a credible nuclear deterrent.

    I have approved the Amendment, authorized its execution, and urge that the Congress give it favorable consideration.

    BARACK OBAMA

Login